Stop suffering for love is revolutionary

Stopping suffering for love is revolutionary.

The most revolutionary thing we, as women, can do in our everyday lives today is to not suffer for the love of a man. Because the patriarchy wants us on our knees, begging or demanding love, dreaming of love, enduring for love, sacrificing ourselves for love, giving up everything just to be loved by a man.

We need to be rebels: we don't have to stay in relationships where we aren't happy, we don't have to settle for scraps of love, we don't have to be understanding towards someone who doesn't know or doesn't want to take care of us, and we don't have to make it our mission to save any man. What we want and what we deserve is to find partners with whom we can enjoy sex, love, and life.

If there's no such partner, it's better to be without a relationship than to suffer for a guy who relishes in our suffering, who feels powerful having one or several women at his feet, all longing for a bit of attention and affection.

Suffering for the love of a man is over: if you're not having fun, if you're not enjoying it, leave that cursed drug behind and start taking good care of yourselves. Let's have fun, because the more we enjoy, the more it frustrates everyone who wants us bitter, insecure, filled with fears, or dependent on a man.

To put an end to the patriarchy, we must free ourselves from the need to be loved by a guy: let's break free from suffering, let's love ourselves properly and be happy, let's fill our lives with affection and lots of genuine love.

Coral Herrera Gómez

Artículo en español:  Dejar de sufrir por amor es revolucionario

 

Never again on our knees: the atheists of love

Romantic love is a kind of postmodern religion, and it has many things in common with the Christian religion. To make us devoted followers, they seduce us with the romantic paradise: that place we will reach after crossing the valley of tears, where we will be happy, feel loved, and live blissfully.

Romanticism also has its own hell, and we fall into it when our partner leaves the relationship, when we offer our love and get rejected, when they are unfaithful to us, lie to us, or betray us, when they take advantage of us, treat us poorly, or betray us, when we lose a battle in the war of love.

Like all religions, romantic love has its saints and martyrs: those lovestruck women who commit suicide "for love," those enamored men who kill "for love," those women who give up everything for love, endure for love, sacrifice themselves in the name of love.

The most famous romantic sufferers are mythologized and glorified by our patriarchal culture to make women admire and emulate them. Patriarchy wants us on our knees, looking up at men just as we look up to Jesus Christ. For many women in the world, he is their first role model: they love him as one loves a God, because Jesus is the Son of God, and we worship him because he loves us, listens to us, accompanies us, protects us, loves us even when we misbehave. And he never abandons us.

Jesus Christ is the Man all suffering women need: the Savior, the Prince Charming, the Don Juan, the Warrior, the Knight who rescues us and takes us to the palace where we will be happy. Some of us spend years and years waiting for his arrival.

The stories of romantic love fascinate us just as much as the sacred stories of religions: we love songs, movies, poems, novels, and tales that narrate stories of love and romantic tragedies. We consume them voraciously because they are like drugs: they momentarily take us away from reality, entertain us, make us feel intense emotions, stir us up inside, bring us peace, and ignite our hope with their happy endings.

Happy endings constantly remind us of the existence of the romantic paradise, that place full of abundance, happiness, peace, harmony, and love. That's how they hook us onto the most powerful drug, the most patriarchal religion. They keep us for many years of our lives, searching for our better half, dreaming of true love, feeling incomplete or unsuccessful, believing that having a partner will shield us from ever feeling lonely again.

For many women who love, romantic love is a collective mirage that can be very dangerous. Because it makes us believe that in order to obtain love, we must first endure suffering, and that suffering is a demonstration of love toward the one who causes us to suffer. Thus, we fall into the trap without realizing that patriarchy wants us on our knees. It needs the pursuit of love to be the center of our lives, for the desire to be loved to render us dependent and submissive, and for us to place a man at the pinnacle of our affections, surrendering ourselves to him with total devotion, as if he were a god.

The female role model presented to us in romantic movies is so reminiscent of the traditional image of the Virgin Mary: the enamored woman is pure, innocent, kind, selfless, devoted, and loyal. She loves and cares without expecting anything in return. She's a woman who believes in her beloved, loves him unconditionally, suffers and sacrifices for love, accompanies the hero in his self-sacrifice, forgets about herself, and focuses solely on love.

All religions have their own ideology and impose it as sacred norms upon their followers. Similarly, in romantic love, all the commandments are aimed at curtailing the freedom of women and ensuring that of men, forcing us to kneel while elevating them to a throne.

That's why there are more and more women who are atheists and rebellious against the romantic religion: we have grown tired of suffering, of praying to be loved, of descending into hell, of enduring torment and paying penance. Fewer and fewer of us live in anticipation of a divine arrival and dream of paradise.

We're rebelling more and more against our role as martyrs: what we want is to enjoy life and relate as equals. We no longer wish to live in a valley of tears; we've had enough of suffering and reject the role of complacent, submissive women who give themselves completely without asking for, or expecting, much in return.

We refuse to wait; we don't want relationships based on domination or submission; we no longer believe in the romantic miracle.

Atheists of romantic love can no longer believe in the romantic myth: we know salvation, happiness, and paradise aren't found there. Women who no longer suffer for love are crafting tools that will one day allow us to unite with a partner without forfeiting our freedom and autonomy.

We want to build equal, healthy relationships without dependency, grounded in the pleasure and joy of life.

We've learned that suffering isn't a prerequisite for happiness.

What we want is to live well, enjoy sex, affection, and love. We're not seeking idols to worship or saviors to rescue us; rather, companions with whom to share a piece of our lives.

We want to experience the love and affection that surround us here and now—without wasting time waiting, without succumbing to false promises of romantic paradise. We'll love with our feet on the ground, being practical and realistic.

They want us bitter and depressed, but they'll find us reveling in love.

They want us isolated and at odds with each other, but they'll find us united and celebrating life.

They want us submissive and enslaved to love, but they'll see us free and empowered.

They want us on our knees, but they'll find all of us standing tall.

Coral Herrera Gómez

 

Original en español:  Las ateas del amor: nunca más de rodillas frente al Señor

 

Men, better as lovers.

"I now have a boyfriend, yes, I have several boyfriends, but I won't be washing anyone's underwear ever again in my life," "I love falling in love, but I'm no longer anyone's servant," "I only see boyfriends and close friends on Sundays, the rest of the days I'm too busy," this is how the Ladies who have achieved liberation speak.

Most of them fell into the trap of romantic love in their youth, and after raising their children, working tirelessly throughout their lives, they become widowed or divorced, and start a new chapter in their lives. I see them so liberated and they are so clear about it: men are just for enjoyment. No sharing a home: they meet them for going to the cinema, to demonstrations, to museums, for walks in the countryside. They enjoy their sessions of sex and love, they read together, listen to music together, learn and practice ballroom dances, attend literary gatherings, do sports, or escape for a few days to explore new places, but their lives do not revolve around them.

I hear these Ladies speak, and it gives me a boost. I look at them and admire them: they enjoy their retirement and savings, they enjoy their friends, grandchildren, and granddaughters, they take classes in a thousand things, they travel, attend concerts and theater, or even perform themselves, they are engaged in women's groups and social movements, they make new friends, take great care of themselves and each other, and they're happier than ever. Finally, they have time for themselves, to pursue their passions, and men are not the center of their existence, just one affection among many in a network of multiple affections.

These are Ladies over 65 who have liberated themselves from the romantic myth: they experienced the excitement, faced disappointments, and now they have no time to waste. They want to spend the remaining years of their lives well, to live without suffering, sacrifices, or enduring, and without giving up everything they gave up during 30 or 40 years of their lives. They want to enjoy, and they know what they want and what they don't. I wish we all had such clarity.

When I wrote the book "Owner of My Love," I thought of them and how we could tell young girls about everything that comes after the romantic wedding, so they don't have to go through the same thing and can love freely. I realized that the formula of these Ladies is the best... the most realistic and practical one. They live so happily, enjoying their freedom, money, energy, and time, free from their traditional roles, autonomous and empowered.

Men are better as lovers: they in their homes, we in ours. It's all advantages: love doesn't deteriorate with cohabitation, there's no abusive or dominating relationships, you have much more free time, you think more about yourself and your pleasure, you have time to miss your guy and feel eager to see him, and when you do get together, you make the most of the present and live it intensely. Both of you feel free, both have your own spaces and times, and there's no accumulation of resentment from daily fights or domestic exploitation, because everyone takes care of their own things.

When men cease to be at the center of your life, you emerge, and wonderful people who love and care for you do too, and your networks of affection multiply. It's then that you realize that love is everywhere, and the partner is just one more of your relationships.

You in your home, me in mine: that's how it's easier to love each other well and enjoy sex and love, within a network of wonderful people, and a partner who doesn't occupy all of the space or time, the two greatest treasures of the Ladies who no longer suffer for love.

The big question women in their thirties ask me is: how can we have children with men without living with them? I tell them about the Mosuo, a tribe in Nepal where women don't live with men: they share a bed at night with their loved ones, but during the day, they share caregiving responsibilities and are organized to work and raise children. So, when a romantic relationship ends, they experience the pain of loss, but they don't crumble because their lives remain unchanged. They continue to live in a network of affection and mutual support: for them, not having a partner doesn't mean being alone.

And for the Ladies, neither does it. If what we want is to suffer less and enjoy love more, my proposal is that we turn our loved ones into our lovers, at least until we stop falling for the romantic hoax and until they learn to relate to free and independent women. We've been working on dismantling patriarchy for years, but we can't sit around waiting for them to start. For now, they don't need to.

If we can't have companionate love relationships with them, if we can't build egalitarian partnerships based on mutual care, then it's better to be practical and engage with men only for fun and enjoyment. For sharing life, we can create a different type of family, with our loved ones, with our networks of women.

And what would happen to men if we refuse to create a happy home and family with them? I believe it would also be very positive for them. They would have to learn to take care of themselves and others, becoming more independent. Initially, it would be difficult for them to give up having a free personal assistant, and it would be challenging for them to learn to relate to free women. They would feel like dethroned kings, but they could gather among themselves to discuss their feelings and seek solace.

Undoubtedly, they would feel disoriented as they no longer occupy the center of women's lives and are not needed for anything, but over time, they would start working on dismantling patriarchal norms to have partners and to enjoy being fathers to the extent they wish. Since they wouldn't have millions of women eager and needy for love at their disposal, they would finally need to make changes to adapt to the new times. Perhaps then, they could engage in self-critique, both personally and collectively, but that's not within our control.

We can only work on our liberation process to become emotionally and economically autonomous, to support and care for each other, and to build relationships with men based on freedom, not need or dependency.

Can you imagine the enormous political and economic changes that would be unleashed by this transformation of our relationships?

Coral Herrera Gómez

 

Original en español: Los hombres, mejor como amantes